NTI drug with high CV? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-14 17:11 (2014 d 12:57 ago) – Posting: # 20976
Views: 3,411

Hi Mikalai,

❝ What would be a sample size for a BE study when the CV of the drug is 30% but bioequivalence should be in range 90_110%?


Unless the drug belongs to the last generation anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban) that's a contradiction. NTIDs show low variability. Otherwise, there would have been serious problems in phase III: toxicity, lacking efficacy – no approval – end of story.
BTW, the acceptance limits for NTIDs in the EEA are 90.00–111.11%.

❝ Our assumption is around 400 subject if the design is standard, and 200 if the design is replicative


library(PowerTOST)
sampleN.TOST(CV = 0.3, theta1 = 0.9, design = "2x2x2")
sampleN.TOST(CV = 0.3, theta1 = 0.9, design = "2x2x4")

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5