From Russia (with love?) [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-12-04 15:16 (603 d 10:24 ago) – Posting: # 20924
Views: 4,003

Hello Helmut!

IMHO, main points:

1. Basic words. Review article.
2. ABEL/RSABE - all have TIE inflation.
3. Biggest inflation when CVintra = 25—30%.
4. EMA aproach better than FDA.

Conclusion:

When you are planning bioequivalence trial better look at EMA guidelines, rather than FDA. We know that all approaches have TIE inflation.

I think this is primarily a message to regulatory experts.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,592 posts in 4,514 threads, 1,532 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 02:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data.    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5