Kenward-Roger? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-11-06 14:43  – Posting: # 20755
Views: 846

» From a theoretical perspective, maybe. The Kenward-Roger approximation recovers more information from the data, higher degrees of freedom and hence, results in a narrower confidence interval than with Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom. Since the latter is explicitely recommended in the progesterone guidance I have some doubts whether the FDA would accept that.

I thought that Kenward-Roger provide the same DF as Satterthwaite's for one-dimension effects, so as CI for coefficient is one-dimension hypothesis DF should be the same, as it describes in reference paper, may be SAS make any corrections, I don't know... Is any comparations anywhere?

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,250 posts in 4,262 threads, 1,397 registered users;
online 22 (0 registered, 22 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 21:44 CET

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5