Kenward-Roger? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-11-06 15:43 (1989 d 16:46 ago) – Posting: # 20755
Views: 12,077

❝ From a theoretical perspective, maybe. The Kenward-Roger approximation recovers more information from the data, higher degrees of freedom and hence, results in a narrower confidence interval than with Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom. Since the latter is explicitely recommended in the progesterone guidance I have some doubts whether the FDA would accept that.


I thought that Kenward-Roger provide the same DF as Satterthwaite's for one-dimension effects, so as CI for coefficient is one-dimension hypothesis DF should be the same, as it describes in reference paper, may be SAS make any corrections, I don't know... Is any comparations anywhere?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,711 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5