Hybrid B/C [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-09-18 15:09 (531 d 13:38 ago) – Posting: # 20612
Views: 4,720

Dear Mikalai,

» What prevents us from evaluating the bioequivalence at α-level of 5% as the first step, and if we pass the bioequivalence criteria, we stop the trial. If we fail, we then evaluate the power. If power is more than 80% for the failed parameter, we stop the trial and we are done. If power is less than 80% for the failed parameter, then we go the next stage and adust α-level correspondingly to preserve overall α-level at 0,5. Of course, this should be written in the protocol and is a deviation, maybe a big one, from Potvin C method.

That’s more or less a hybrid of Method C (where you asses power first) and Method B (where you assess power after). You are free to develop such a method but have to validate it (i.e., find a suitable adjusted α which controls the type I error in every possible combination of n1/CV).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,359 posts in 4,460 threads, 1,492 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 04:47 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

The art and science of asking questions
is the source of all knowledge.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5