Blind 2Stage [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-05-30 10:56 (689 d 09:08 ago) – Posting: # 20306
Views: 4,470

Hi Nastia,

» But can you clarify me the meaning of blindness in BE trials?

You know its meaning. ;-)
Never seen ones, except for Health Canada:

2.4.2 Blinding
To avoid study bias, comparative bioavailability studies should be conducted in such a way that the subjects are not aware of which product (test or reference) is being administered.


That’s a funny idea if the products don’t look the same.

» […] it turns out that blinding may even worse the situation (5.01% vs 7.36%, TIE). It is connected with the unknown PE (cause for BLIND=TRUE s20s<-mses), but isn't it contrintuitive?

Yes and yes. Have a look at Figure 1 of Golkowski et al.*

» Can it be true for parallel design also? Suppose we want to make a blind interim analyses after first stage with N subjects and recalculate sample size on fixed GMR=0.95 if total CV would be greater than initial suggestion. Will it cause any inflation?

Possibly.

» How to estimate it?

Simulations… Might be tricky cause we have to think about unequal group sizes and/or variances.

BTW, do you remember Paola Coppola’s presentation at last year’s BioBridges?

[image]




Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,508 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 20:05 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5