Power_80_20 [Power / Sample Size]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-01-04 00:24  – Posting: # 19726
Views: 715


» In the results it is also evident that the post-hoc statistical power (power_TOST) is less than 80%, this is because the estimated point is greater than 105%, considering that the sample size was estimated expecting a difference less than / equal to 5%.

There are 3 basic factors in power calc: sample size, CV and PE. In post-hoc analysis sample size is fixed, but do not forget about CV! So the conclusion is valid if CV is equal or less than expected

» However, the statistical power of the ANOVA (Power_80_20) supports that the sample size used in the study was adequate, since the values ​​are greater than 90%.

:-D I think it should go to the trash bin. That's a conclusion based on WNL output, right?
See this old thread
That 'magick power' is not a power of ANOVA (whenever it could be) but the result of equality test using delta = 20%. That test has much more power than PowerTOST, thus, the value is higher than the previous one.
You cannot assess the sample size using that test.

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,545 posts in 4,145 threads, 1,340 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 10:37 CEST

Anyone who has never made a mistake
has never tried anything new.    Albert Einstein

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz