Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Group Effect in Full Replicate Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by GM – India, 2018-09-12 17:19 (1727 d 22:50 ago) – Posting: # 19277
Views: 6,128

Dear Helmut,

Thank you very much for the clarification. One more last question...

❝ ❝ ❝ Honestly, I have no clue how to modify the models given in the progesterone-guidance.

❝

❝ Specifically the scaling-part…

❝ For the ABE part (if s_wR <0.294) like the FDA’s Model II:

• fixed:
  

  ❝ Group, Sequence, Treatment, Period (nested within Group), Group-by-Sequence Interaction
  

  ❝

• random:
  

  ❝ Subject (nested within Group × Sequence)

But as per Progesterone Guidance, Treatment as random term in Average BE.

Please see model SAS code from guidance.

MODEL LAUCT = SEQ PER TRT/ DDFM=SATTERTH;
RANDOM TRT/TYPE=FA0(2) SUB=SUBJ G;

As per your version, Subject (nested within Group × Sequence) is the random term.

Now am Confused,Which is the correct one?

Complete thread:

• Group Effect in Full Replicate Design GM 2018-09-12 07:17 [RSABE / ABEL] 
  • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design Helmut 2018-09-12 11:20
    • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design GM 2018-09-12 12:32
      • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design Helmut 2018-09-12 13:08
        • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design GM 2018-09-12 13:23
          • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design Helmut 2018-09-12 15:09
            • Group Effect in Full Replicate DesignGM 2018-09-12 15:19
              • Group Effect in Full Replicate Design Helmut 2018-09-12 15:31
                • Group Effect in Replicate Design zizou 2018-09-12 23:30
                  • Group Effect in Replicate Design Helmut 2018-09-13 11:34