But what is the real problem? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-06-07 15:53 (2582 d 17:47 ago) – Posting: # 18863
Views: 6,596

Hi Yura,

you do your study as best you can, making some assumoptions -good or bad- about GMR and CV.
At the end of the day you may show BE or not, and if you do, then it may be with a large or small margin. I guess forced BE just means the margin was large whatever that means quantitatively.
There is no real issue here. The discussions I have seen about BE consider forced BE as a hindsight phenomenon, like post-hoc power.

If you start fiddling with "forced BE" being convincingly planned before a trial then I would of course oppose it.

Remember: In principle, either the product is BE or it isn't. There just happens to be some uncertainty on the degree by which we can demonstrate it.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,684 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do.    Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5