Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by valivetiananth – India, 2018-06-02 08:52 (1334 d 14:37 ago) – Posting: # 18841
Views: 6,418

Thanks for your reply.

» » We have conducted a pivotal study for Europe with 48 subjects considering ~80% power, ISCV: 23%.
» » The study was bioequivalent and 90% CI is within 80-125 for both Cmax & AUCt.
» » Power of Cmax and AUCt are 92% & 66% respectively.
»
» In this order? Can you give us their CVs and GMRs?

CV- Cmax: 27.731; AUCt: 22.678

GMR-Cmax: 97.76; AUCt: 87.99


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,854 posts in 4,573 threads, 1,554 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 22:29 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The real purpose of the scientific method is to make sure
nature hasn’t misled you into thinking you know something
you actually don’t know.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5