Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by valivetiananth – India, 2018-06-02 10:52 (2451 d 01:06 ago) – Posting: # 18841
Views: 8,164

Thanks for your reply.

❝ ❝ We have conducted a pivotal study for Europe with 48 subjects considering ~80% power, ISCV: 23%.

❝ ❝ The study was bioequivalent and 90% CI is within 80-125 for both Cmax & AUCt.

❝ ❝ Power of Cmax and AUCt are 92% & 66% respectively.


❝ In this order? Can you give us their CVs and GMRs?


CV- Cmax: 27.731; AUCt: 22.678

GMR-Cmax: 97.76; AUCt: 87.99


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,662 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5