[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 16:52 (1602 d 02:33 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 8,884

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 19:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no point in being precise when you don’t know
what you’re talking about.    attributed to John Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5