[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 16:52 (1304 d 13:05 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 8,490

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,753 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 05:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5