[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 18:52 (2650 d 23:50 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 11,807

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,679 registered users;
59 visitors (0 registered, 59 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Fools with Tools Are Still Fools!    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5