TIE for NTIDs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-06 13:34 (2302 d 06:07 ago) – Posting: # 18363
Views: 20,086

Dear Detlew,

❝ […] the entry suggest for me that the TIE (with values >0.05) is significant <0.05. Maybe it's my misunderstanding. To avoid this many statisticians state "significant at alpha=0.05". But then the Hypotheses have to be given else.


I see!

Change lines 17 and 32 from
res  <- cbind(CVs, n=NA, forced=FALSE, GMR=NA, TIE=NA,
              signif=" n. s.", stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
  if (res[j, "TIE"] > bt.sig) res[j, "signif"] <- "p<0.05"

to
res  <- cbind(CVs, n=NA, forced=FALSE, GMR=NA, TIE=NA,
              "signif >0.05"="n. s.", stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
  if (res[j, "TIE"] > bt.sig)
    res[j, "signif >0.05"] <- "at alpha=0.05"

Will give
swT/swR: 2
   CVwT   CVwR   n      GMR      TIE  signif >0.05
 0.0600 0.0300 430 1.032106 0.050580 at alpha=0.05
 0.0801 0.0400 156 1.043027 0.048675         n. s.
 ...

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

That which is static and repetitive is boring.
That which is dynamic and random is confusing.
In between lies art.    John Locke

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5