111.11 for NTIDs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Astea – Russia, 2018-02-05 20:27 (1878 d 13:37 ago) – Posting: # 18358
Views: 19,174

Dear Helmut!

❝ Where did you find that?

I have to apologize - it turned out that I reffered to the draft version . In two years the mistape was corrected (or someone improved its rounding skills :)

❝ I’m not willing to accept 111.11%. Heck, with an acceptable ∆ of 10% we get \(100(1-\Delta)^{-1}=111.1\dot{1}\) – nothing else! I will not forget my second-grade math only cause it’s claimed ex cathedra by the oracle. Had to swallow already rounding of the CI. Double rounding? Gimme a break!

Then why do we use 80,00? "Because in the former case the numbers look nicer and are easier to remember :-D
Of course 111.00 is nonsense and should be forgotten.

"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,557 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,608 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A scientist’s aim in a discussion with his colleagues
is not to persuade, but to clarify.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5