TIE for NTIDs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-05 18:49 (2702 d 20:42 ago) – Posting: # 18355
Views: 22,218

Dear Detlew,

❝ Only one nitpicking:


❝ I think the entries under signif

p<0.05 should read p>0.05.


Hhm, why? I’m testing at the 5% level for a significant inflation. The limit for 106 sim’s is
binom.test(0.05*1e6, 1e6, alternative="less")$conf.int[2]
[1] 0.05035995

Hence, any TIE > this value should be significant.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,679 registered users;
52 visitors (0 registered, 52 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Fools with Tools Are Still Fools!    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5