TIE for NTIDs [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-02-05 18:49 (1880 d 10:45 ago) – Posting: # 18355
Views: 19,193

Dear Detlew,

❝ Only one nitpicking:

❝ I think the entries under signif

p<0.05 should read p>0.05.

Hhm, why? I’m testing at the 5% level for a significant inflation. The limit for 106 sim’s is
binom.test(0.05*1e6, 1e6, alternative="less")$conf.int[2]
[1] 0.05035995

Hence, any TIE > this value should be significant.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,559 posts in 4,725 threads, 1,607 registered users;
12 visitors (0 registered, 12 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The penalty for scientific irrelevance is, of course,
that the statistician’s work is ignored by the scientific community.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz