Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody – 2017-11-14 09:11 (2795 d 01:30 ago) – Posting: # 17978
Views: 10,374

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,685 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5