sample size in bioequivalence studies [Power / Sample Size]

posted by daryazyatina – Ukraine, 2017-08-03 12:58 (3243 d 19:39 ago) – Posting: # 17650
Views: 22,796

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ Good choice :-D


Thank you

❝ Can you tell what your design is and which values you want to plug in for the calculation? If the difference is 2 or 4 subjects, then so be it, subtle differences in approximation may account for that. If the difference is 46 or something then I'd wonder, too. I am sure there is an explanation and that your confidence in the powerTOST package can easily be restored.


For comparison, I use all the standard properties. Design 2x2, confidence intervals 0.8 - 1.25, power 0.8, alpha 0.05.
The only thing about what I'm not sure is CV. Because in formula that I used this is intra-subject variability, but in PowerTOST() this is coefficient of variation as ratio. In calculations in both cases I used СV - 0.3.

And this is results from sampleN.TOST()
sampleN.TOST(logscale = TRUE, CV = 0.3, details = TRUE)
+++++++++++ Equivalence test - TOST +++++++++++
            Sample size estimation
-----------------------------------------------
Study design:  2x2 crossover
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)

alpha = 0.05, target power = 0.8
BE margins = 0.8 ... 1.25
True ratio = 0.95,  CV = 0.3

Sample size (total)
 n     power
40   0.815845

The sample size by the formula I used:

n=28

❝ Apart from that you are of course right if you intended to hint that the author of the power.TOST family of R functions is a dubious character.


:-D:-D:-D

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5