Obsession? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Dear Detlew,
I’m sick of some statisticians’ obsession with mathematical proofs.
The three-body problem in physics can’t be solved analytically. However, man landed on the moon and the New Horizons space probe reached Pluto. Same goes with the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics. Aircraft are designed by the finite element method (fortunately resulting in a much, much lower risk* than 0.05). If statisticians are so worried about numeric methods they should stop traveling – except by foot.
Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine
but likes to dabble in both. Stephen Senn
I’m sick of some statisticians’ obsession with mathematical proofs.
The three-body problem in physics can’t be solved analytically. However, man landed on the moon and the New Horizons space probe reached Pluto. Same goes with the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics. Aircraft are designed by the finite element method (fortunately resulting in a much, much lower risk* than 0.05). If statisticians are so worried about numeric methods they should stop traveling – except by foot.
Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine
but likes to dabble in both. Stephen Senn
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- The EMA’s BSWP’s opinon Helmut 2016-03-04 15:37 [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
- The EMA’s BSWP’s opinon ElMaestro 2016-03-04 23:16
- Control of the TIE (empiric via simulations vs. proof) Helmut 2016-03-05 15:17
- To whom it may concern ElMaestro 2016-03-06 22:59
- To whom it may concern d_labes 2016-03-07 11:41
- To whom it may concern ElMaestro 2016-03-06 22:59
- Control of the TIE (empiric via simulations vs. proof) Helmut 2016-03-05 15:17
- Opinon? d_labes 2016-03-06 13:31
- Obsession?Helmut 2016-03-06 14:45
- Obsession? DavidManteigas 2016-06-02 12:57
- 0.0501 not acceptable Helmut 2016-06-02 13:30
- OT: Guernsey McPearson's Drug Development Dictionary d_labes 2016-06-02 14:44
- OT: Comparison Helmut 2016-06-02 15:59
- OT: Comparison d_labes 2016-06-02 16:42
- OT: Comparison Helmut 2016-06-02 15:59
- OT: Guernsey McPearson's Drug Development Dictionary d_labes 2016-06-02 14:44
- 0.0501 not acceptable Helmut 2016-06-02 13:30
- Obsession? DavidManteigas 2016-06-02 12:57
- Obsession?Helmut 2016-03-06 14:45
- The EMA’s BSWP’s opinon ElMaestro 2016-03-04 23:16