Post hoc Power [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2016-01-08 16:07 (3024 d 22:23 ago) – Posting: # 15805
Views: 11,813

Hi Jay,

❝ As per discussions previous posts, the post of power is not taken into much consideration.

❝ But when the post hoc power of AUCt and AUCinf is observed around 90-100% while the posthoc power of Cmax is less than 20%, then what would be the probable reason for the same.


First of all, I think you should mention how you calculate post-hoc power. Do you use GMR=0.95, GMR=1.0 or observed?
Anyways, low post-hoc power could be due to deviating GMR (for the case you use the observed GMR; this is likely a product failure) or it could be due to high variability, or both.

If you have a situation with deviating Cmax point estimate but OK AUCt point estimate, then you are facing a challenge.

Having said all, I must admit I am also in the camp of people who think post-hoc power is either rubbish or of very limited value.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,655 registered users;
100 visitors (0 registered, 100 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5