Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Why not? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Jay – India, 2015-11-02 12:29 (3531 d 10:05 ago) – Posting: # 15599
Views: 7,663

Dear d_labes,

Thanks for the response.

If CV of one parameter such as AUC5-t is observed more than 100% while for other parameter such as Cmax, Auc0-5 or AUCinf is within 20-30%. So should one go for full replicate design and sample size estimation based on highest CV observed as 114%.

Regard,
Jay

Complete thread:

Sample size with CV more than 100% Jay 2015-11-02 10:47 [Power / Sample Size]
- Why not? d_labes 2015-11-02 11:08
  - Why not?Jay 2015-11-02 11:29
    - Sample size for HVD's d_labes 2015-11-02 13:06
      - EMA: MR – ABEL for partial AUCs Helmut 2015-11-02 14:35
        
        EMA: MR – ABEL for partial AUCs d_labes 2015-11-02 14:48

Admin contact
23,426 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,682 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do. Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz