Answering an un­asked ques­tion [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-07-02 15:03 (3567 d 16:03 ago) – Posting: # 15016
Views: 30,769

Dear Detlew!

❝ Sometimes it would be helpful to RTFM :-D.


Oh, I did. You will note that I hacked your code of CVp2CV() for my function sep2s(). :-D

❝ Note that the ratio is here the ratio of variances.


Exactly. But I was interested in the ratio of standard errors instead.

library(PowerTOST)
sep2s <- function(CV, ratio=1) {
  sp  <- CV2mse(CV)
  swt <- sqrt(2)*sqrt(sp)*ratio/sqrt(ratio^2+1)
  swr <- sqrt(2)*sqrt(sp)/sqrt(ratio^2+1)
  r   <- se2CV(c(swt, swr))
  return(r)
}
CV    <- 0.07
ratio <- 2
r1    <- CVp2CV(CV=CV, ratio=ratio)
mse1  <- CV2mse(r1)
se1   <- CV2se(r1)
r2    <- sep2s(CV=CV, ratio=ratio)
mse2  <- CV2mse(r2)
se2   <- CV2se(r2)
cat("Function CVp2CV()\n",
"CV", CV, "split based on the variance ratio:", signif(r1, 3), "\n",
"variances:", signif(mse1, 3), "ratio:", signif(mse1[1]/mse1[2], 3), "\n",
"standard errors:", signif(se1, 3), "ratio:", signif(se1[1]/se1[2], 3),
"\nFunction sep2s()\n",
"CV", CV, "split based on the SE ratio:",  signif(r2, 3), "\n",
"variances:", signif(mse2, 3), "ratio:", signif(mse2[1]/mse2[2], 3), "\n",
"standard errors:", signif(se1, 3), "ratio:", signif(se2[1]/se2[2], 3), "\n")


Which gives:

Function CVp2CV()
 CV 0.07 split based on the variance ratio: 0.0809 0.0571
 variances: 0.00652 0.00326 ratio: 2
 standard errors: 0.0807 0.0571 ratio: 1.41
Function sep2s()
 CV 0.07 split based on the SE ratio: 0.0886 0.0442
 variances: 0.00782 0.00196 ratio: 4
 standard errors: 0.0807 0.0571 ratio: 2


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,415 posts in 4,925 threads, 1,666 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5