post hoc power [Power / Sample Size]

posted by VSL – India, 2015-07-01 21:37 (3510 d 08:37 ago) – Posting: # 15008
Views: 9,292

Dear,
It has been seen that In protocol, larger sample size is selected to just pass the study without any scientific justification or selecting high T/R in sample size calculation. Therefore, in many cases, post hoc power is more than 100% or nearly 100%. It is like forced bio-equivalence.
Does regulator seek justification for this?
Thanks and Regards...
VSL


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,665 registered users;
122 visitors (0 registered, 122 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:15 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5