3 period full replicate [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-06-25 10:52 (3518 d 13:33 ago) – Posting: # 14983
Views: 31,180

Dear Helmut et al.

I think it's a waste of time to discuss this bizarre opinion of a "leading European regulatory authority" in detail.
Scientifically there is IMHO not a single argument to underpin this opinion.
All details in Dan's quote are simply not true. Full stop.

Unfortunately it seems that scientific arguments don't play a big role in some regulators "opinions". And much, much more unfortunately regulators don't have to justify their judgements :crying:.

So what's left? Your tip: "Don’t select them as a RMS!"
Another possibility would be to reactivate our Ol' pirate as a regulator :-D

BTW: The handling of the Concept paper on HVDs/HVDPs is revealing ...

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,379 posts in 4,913 threads, 1,661 registered users;
235 visitors (0 registered, 235 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:26 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is what you know.
Philosophy is what you don’t know.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5