Lousy review process [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody – 2015-05-28 17:53 (4048 d 19:17 ago) – Posting: # 14872
Views: 14,030

❝ Even in a fancy bioanalytic method we rarely see a CV of <5%. 4.4% of Cmax in a parallel design? Gimme a break. :not really:


OT, but slightly on topic, maybe, at least a little bit:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
364 visitors (0 registered, 364 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5