Lousy review process [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody – 2015-05-28 17:53 (4045 d 02:36 ago) – Posting: # 14872
Views: 13,987

❝ Even in a fancy bioanalytic method we rarely see a CV of <5%. 4.4% of Cmax in a parallel design? Gimme a break. :not really:


OT, but slightly on topic, maybe, at least a little bit:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
120 visitors (0 registered, 120 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5