The power of post hoc power [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-05-13 19:53 (4056 d 22:16 ago) – Posting: # 14810
Views: 14,078

Hi Outlaw Torn,

❝ My first thought is that, yeah, it's the same principle as with standard bioequivalence (...)


You were right from the beginning.

❝ Questions are being raised that the sample size may have been inadequate.


And that could also be correct. Power is based on assumptions. If those assumptions are wrong (like the point estimate, the variability) then that is an issue. So perhaps you'd be revising your assumptions when you do power/Sample sze for the next trial.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
130 visitors (0 registered, 130 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5