Lousy review process [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-05-06 20:21 (4066 d 23:11 ago) – Posting: # 14767
Views: 14,599

Hi nobody,

❝ sorry for OT, but this is really, really, really, really.... strange ;-)


Even with a fancy bioanalytical method we rarely see a CV of <5%. 4.4% of Cmax in a parallel design? Gimme a break. :not really:

❝ How about a letter to the editor with exactly this question. Something like that should not go unopposed, at least with showing all raw data (really raw)...


Grumpy mood? Do you have a budget to buy the paper?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5