to exclude or not to ex­clude - let the user decide [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2015-03-31 11:15 (2609 d 11:56 ago) – Posting: # 14637
Views: 24,355

Dear Elmaestro,

Thanks for your comments.

» how about having a procedure that determines if a given period for a subject subject has
» – three (consecutive?) ascending data points
» – three (consecutive?) descending data points

OK but sounds more complicated...

» If yes, include the period for that subject as she does have a rudimentary profile, and if no, exclude the period for that subject.

only to exclude "the period for that subject" or "all periods of that subject"? Which one is more acceptable? latter one? [edit: I mean when doing 90% CI and other stats.. The rest of periods of that subject will still perform NCA. Sorry about this.]

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.1:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 25 (0 registered, 25 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 23:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz