TIE: questions [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-02-03 13:44 (3753 d 10:34 ago) – Posting: # 14361
Views: 22,790

Dear Helmut,

Could you please help with the following questions:

1. Could you explain:

❝ At 30% the chance for such a wrong decision is 50%. Therefore, we can expect the highest inflation of the TIE at 30%.


But:

❝ Maximum inflation of the TIE 0.0684 (at CV 30.1%).

(in your post below)

Why the maximum inflation is not observed exactly at 30%?

2. Where did you get the image with inflation of the TIE? (is it possible to find it in high resolution?)
As I understand the TIE in this image can be changed to CI for adjusted α. (So the black line is the line of 90% CI)

3. I read this thread one more time, but didn't catch one thing
For example before the study (TRT|RTR) I have estimated number of subjects 42 proceeded from expected CV (40%), required power (80%), TIE (5%) and expected Ratio (90% for HVD).
OK, I'm on a lucky side, the CV and GMR were as expected.
After that I should adjust the TIE (and wide the CI). And new CI could be outside the limits!
Could I expect it and plan the study in accordance with coming procedure of TIE adjusting?
Yes, it is not possible to counteract the inflation by a pre­spe­cified adjusted α, but as well as for power is it possible to use some "critical limits"?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current.    Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5