Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroids [RSABE / ABEL]
Hi nobody,
Wow. Didn’t know that I issued some.
Dammit, at leftover from editing. Should read “… labeling of the y-axis isnot unfortunate.” Since they looked at GMR 1.25 they shouldn’t call if TIE for any CVwR >30%.
I updated the plots. The solid black line is at 0.05 and the dotted red line at the significance limit for 106 simulations (0.05036). Blue circles are ≤0.05036 and red circles >0.05036.
❝ Hi Mr. Schütz (still have your stocks )
Wow. Didn’t know that I issued some.
❝ […] What do you mean when you write:
❝ "...Therefore, the labeling of the y-axis is not unfortunate."
Dammit, at leftover from editing. Should read “… labeling of the y-axis is
I updated the plots. The solid black line is at 0.05 and the dotted red line at the significance limit for 106 simulations (0.05036). Blue circles are ≤0.05036 and red circles >0.05036.
- We must not be concerned about the TIE if the CVWR is rather high (40ish).
- There is inflation of the TIE even for “true” CVwR ≤30%. Counterintuitive first, but a consequence of the data-driven decision. If the true (but unknown) CVwR ≤30%, in a certain fraction of studies we falsely apply scaling (based on the observed CVwR >30%). At 30% the chance for such a wrong decision is 50:50. Therefore, we can expect the highest inflation of the TIE at 30%.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- EMA oracle Helmut 2015-01-27 16:27 [RSABE / ABEL]
- EMA oracle nobody 2015-01-27 17:07
- Personal opinion ElMaestro 2015-01-27 17:56
- EMA oracle d_labes 2015-01-27 19:44
- EMA oracle nobody 2015-01-28 09:04
- EMA oracle ElMaestro 2015-01-28 13:11
- EMA oracle nobody 2015-01-28 09:04
- Response from Alfredo García-Arieta Helmut 2015-01-30 10:55
- Response from Alfredo García-Arieta nobody 2015-01-30 14:55
- Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroids Helmut 2015-02-01 01:35
- Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroids nobody 2015-02-01 11:18
- Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroidsHelmut 2015-02-01 14:49
- General remarks ElMaestro 2015-02-01 18:43
- General remarks nobody 2015-02-01 22:04
- General remarks Helmut 2015-02-02 00:48
- General remarks nobody 2015-02-02 08:09
- General remarks Helmut 2015-02-02 14:06
- TIE: questions mittyri 2015-02-03 12:44
- TIE: questions Helmut 2015-02-03 13:24
- TIE: questions mittyri 2015-02-03 12:44
- General remarks Helmut 2015-02-02 14:06
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation d_labes 2015-02-03 12:02
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation Helmut 2015-02-03 12:22
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation d_labes 2015-02-03 13:07
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation Helmut 2015-02-03 13:41
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation d_labes 2015-02-03 13:07
- FDA RSABE & alpha inflation Helmut 2015-02-03 12:22
- General remarks nobody 2015-02-02 08:09
- Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroids nobody 2015-02-01 11:18
- Wonnemann’s Figure 4 on steroids Helmut 2015-02-01 01:35
- Response from Alfredo García-Arieta nobody 2015-01-30 14:55
- New Zealand nobody 2015-01-31 11:25
- New Zealand Helmut 2015-02-01 16:08
- New Zealand nobody 2015-02-01 22:08
- New Zealand Helmut 2015-02-01 23:54
- New Zealand nobody 2015-02-02 08:07
- New Zealand Helmut 2015-02-01 23:54
- New Zealand nobody 2015-02-01 22:08
- New Zealand Helmut 2015-02-01 16:08