S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-12-23 18:17 (4198 d 03:02 ago) – Posting: # 14152
Views: 46,916

Hi Angus,

❝ But I cannot reconcile it with immediately below, since this pertains to the average BE part of the template so why do it if you are focusing on RSABE?


I meant the sub-WF of the RSABE-WF. I stated “Prepare Data for RSABE analysis”, right?

❝ Also I had planned on doing the three chi-squared calculations in NCSS described in Part 4 of the new Methylphendiate Guidance (2014). I am puzzled by how you can do this in Phoenix (see below)


❝ ❝ Ana’s new templates removed the clumsy workaround for joining values of the χ², since chiinv(p, df) was introduced in PHX/WNL6.4 and can be used in the custom trans­formation.


PHX’s function chiinv(p, df) expects a p-value (here 0.95) and the degrees of freedom (df) from the model. See my previous post (answer #2) where to look in the template how it can be coded.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
151 visitors (0 registered, 151 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5