S×F vari­­ance [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-12-23 18:17 (4198 d 10:23 ago) – Posting: # 14152
Views: 46,917

Hi Angus,

❝ But I cannot reconcile it with immediately below, since this pertains to the average BE part of the template so why do it if you are focusing on RSABE?


I meant the sub-WF of the RSABE-WF. I stated “Prepare Data for RSABE analysis”, right?

❝ Also I had planned on doing the three chi-squared calculations in NCSS described in Part 4 of the new Methylphendiate Guidance (2014). I am puzzled by how you can do this in Phoenix (see below)


❝ ❝ Ana’s new templates removed the clumsy workaround for joining values of the χ², since chiinv(p, df) was introduced in PHX/WNL6.4 and can be used in the custom trans­formation.


PHX’s function chiinv(p, df) expects a p-value (here 0.95) and the degrees of freedom (df) from the model. See my previous post (answer #2) where to look in the template how it can be coded.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
140 visitors (0 registered, 140 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5