Reference for CI ⇒ MSE [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-12-14 02:51 (4215 d 21:15 ago) – Posting: # 14070
Views: 19,533

Hi Monica,

❝ […] the mexican regulatory agency asked for a scientific justification or a bibliography where the robustness of the formula can be proved/demosntrated. Do you have the specific reference of this?


Nothing about robustness yet, but by chance I found a reference* in my files “[…] how to retrieve residual intrasubject mean squared error from historical summary results in the literature.” ;-)
Given in the Examples 2–4: 90% CI 0.83–1.15, N 30Detlew Labes implemented my formulas in the R package PowerTOST, function CI2CV(). With this little code

library(PowerTOST)
LL  <- 0.83
UL  <- 1.15
N   <- 30
des <- c("paired", "2x2x2", "3x6x3")
for (j in seq_along(des)) {
  cat(sprintf("%6s design: intrasubject MSE %.4f%s", des[j],
              CV2mse(CI2CV(lower=LL, upper=UL, n=N, design=des[j],
              alpha=0.05)), "\n"))
}


I got…

paired design: intrasubject MSE 0.1381
 2x2x2 design: intrasubject MSE 0.1378
 3x6x3 design: intrasubject MSE 0.1425


… matching results of the reference.

Hope it’s not too late for the authority…



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
295 visitors (0 registered, 295 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5