Open your mouth and forcefully spit the water out [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2013-10-22 11:03 (4625 d 00:05 ago) – Posting: # 11724
Views: 29,745

Hi Helmut,

❝ Have you asked them which methods would be acceptable according to their impeccable wisdom instead? They should enlighten us simpletons.


No, I contact them indirectly (through a colleague of mine).

❝ Yes. For some recent (this year’s) experiences see slide 45 of this presentation. Method C [sic] accepted by Germany (RMS) and CMSs Austria, Denmark, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Spain asked for an all-fixed effects analysis (subjects within sequence were random in the original analysis).


Seems the same one as I saw in Budapest in your talk this May. This is actually the very reason I wanted to ask the same question again since you have presented some studies already... Well, now we know how it goes...

❝ ... I hope someone has the balls and goes for a referral. If a GL (not a law anyway) states 2×2=5 I would wholeheartedly ignore it for sure.


If that's my own company, I probably will. :lol3: Unfortunately I have boss to answer to...

❝ ... A paper “On the Statistical Model of the Two-Stage Design in Bioequivalence Assessment” by Karalis/Macheras is currently under review (J Pharm Pharmacol). ...


Interesting. Thanks. I'll get it when it is published.

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5