forget the partial replicate [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-10-18 02:14 (4630 d 09:34 ago) – Posting: # 11680
Views: 17,586

Hi Niraj,

❝ We have a data of partial replicate (TRR,RRT,RTR) pilot study and we have within-subject variability of reference formulation.

❝ Now suppose we want to estimate sample size for pivotal partial replicate (TRR,RRT,RTR) study using pilot study results.


As John suggested go with PowerTOST. I would abandon the lousy partial replicate and opt for a fully replicated 3-period design (TRT|RTR) instead. If by any chance you are not allowed to scale (sWR <0.294), the partial replicate sometimes fails to converge in any (!) software. If that happens, you are in trouble. You have performed a study and are not able get a result (maybe TYPE=FA0(1) instead of TYPE=FA0(2) works – see this thread).
BTW, for HVDs/HVDPs I would never assume 90% < GMR <111% even if you saw such a GMR in the pilot. The GMR might jump around between studies. Don’t be overly optimistic.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
174 visitors (0 registered, 174 guests [including 35 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5