FA0(1) in PHX: works (& more questions) [RSABE / ABEL]
Hi Linda!
THX, confirmed. I screwed up the setup (correct BE but wrong LME) – therefore the “difference”.
So is
Or abandon the partial replicate completely and opt for TRT|RTR – which seems to “work” according to Detlew’s findings?
To make a long story short: What will hurt FDA more or less likely accept?
❝ I was able to run both LinMix and Bioeq in Phoenix and their results matched. Also when I excluded the four subjects with incomplete data, I got:
❝ PE= 90.503 90% CI: 73.561–111.347
❝ so the same as what Detlew posted in his next post with the SAS results. I emailed you a project.
THX, confirmed. I screwed up the setup (correct BE but wrong LME) – therefore the “difference”.

So is
FA0(1)
the solution? Is FDA’s code – calling for FA0(2)
– mandatory (aka “Holy Grail”)? As Wolfgang pointed out above in the general BE guidance FDA stated:In the Random statement, TYPE=FA0(2)
could possibly be replaced by TYPE=CSH
.
FA0(1)
as well?Or abandon the partial replicate completely and opt for TRT|RTR – which seems to “work” according to Detlew’s findings?
To make a long story short: What will hurt FDA more or less likely accept?
- Using the partial replicate (= guidance) and switch to
FA0(1)
(≠ guidance), or
- Using a fully replicated 3-period design (≠ guidance) and keep
FA0(2)
(= guidance)?
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- RSAB model overspecified Wolfgang 2013-08-05 14:37 [RSABE / ABEL]
- RSAB model overspecified jag009 2013-08-05 15:35
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate d_labes 2013-08-05 15:59
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate Wolfgang 2013-08-05 16:24
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate ElMaestro 2013-08-05 17:19
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate Wolfgang 2013-08-06 08:35
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate ElMaestro 2013-08-06 10:34
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate Wolfgang 2013-08-06 08:35
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate d_labes 2013-08-06 10:30
- FA0(1) for partial replicate in Phoenix Helmut 2013-08-07 15:13
- FA0(1) for partial replicate in SAS d_labes 2013-08-08 09:42
- FA0(1) for partial replicate in Phoenix lhughes 2013-08-30 15:17
- FA0(1) in PHX: works (& more questions)Helmut 2013-08-30 17:07
- FA0(1) for partial replicate in Phoenix Helmut 2013-08-07 15:13
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate ElMaestro 2013-08-05 17:19
- Proc Mixed FA0(1) for partial replicate Wolfgang 2013-08-05 16:24