TRT|RTR rulez? Really? Yes. [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-08-14 13:29 (4701 d 12:11 ago) – Posting: # 11278
Views: 12,841

Hi d_labes,

❝ Read chapter 9.3 of Chow and Liu, especially 9.3.4 "Assessment of Intra-Subject Variabilities". And if you have, read it again.


how was the birthday? Me and 17 friends thought of partycrashing at your home but due to an unfortunate event recently involving twenty ostriches, a nuclear power station and a barrel of rum we decided against it.

I don't really get all the points of C&L. If any :-D

❝ (...) there is no valid way to evaluate T versus R in case of heteroscedasticity. And this renders the advantage useless.


Can you explain me why in words that are adapted to people with walnut-sized brains such as myself?

❝ A valid evaluation with GLM-ANOVA or even with intra-subject contrasts, which in other replicate designs is able to deal with different variabilities, has to assume s2wT=s2wR.


I am quite sure that it is possible to make GLM work ad modum EMA's recent adventures with fixed effects, by tampering a bit with the data sets and factor inclusions, allowing extractions of individual variances.

Anways, we are now digressing from the original topic. To which I'd still appreciate some responses. :-D

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
357 visitors (0 registered, 357 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5