Bingo! [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-29 13:32 (4706 d 09:39 ago) – Posting: # 11099
Views: 11,650

Hi Oiinkie,

❝ To avoid the "too progressive" design of a two-stage three-treatment study, we will go for a three-treatment pilot and base our decision for the test formulation on this study.


Good idea. Given the strange responses I have seen in the recent past from European regulators even on straightforward two-stage designs I would not recommend such an approach – unless a framework is published. Nevertheless, a tempting idea which deserves some attention, IMHO.
(:waving: ElMaestro?)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
168 visitors (0 registered, 168 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5