throw away our sample size tables? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-26 19:02 (4489 d 04:57 ago) – Posting: # 10289
Views: 25,794

Hi Martin!

iteratively adjusted alpha – super idea!


If the inflation of the consumer’s risk is real (based on our assumption to estimate pBE with a GMR at the borders of the scaled acceptance range) regulators should revise their methods. Would increase the sample size and IMHO requires a multi-step procedure.
  1. Estimate the sample size for unadjusted α
  2. Estimate adjusted α for this n
  3. Estimate the sample size for adjusted α
  4. Repeat steps 2–3 until you are in limbo

❝ […] two weirdos published a paper […]



Not their only crime. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,673 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5