throw away our sample size tables? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-26 17:02 (2970 d 00:44 ago) – Posting: # 10289
Views: 18,197

Hi Martin!

» iteratively adjusted alpha – super idea!

If the inflation of the consumer’s risk is real (based on our assumption to estimate pBE with a GMR at the borders of the scaled acceptance range) regulators should revise their methods. Would increase the sample size and IMHO requires a multi-step procedure.
  1. Estimate the sample size for unadjusted α
  2. Estimate adjusted α for this n
  3. Estimate the sample size for adjusted α
  4. Repeat steps 2–3 until you are in limbo

» […] two weirdos published a paper […]

Not their only crime. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,460 posts in 4,486 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 17:46 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing in the world is more dangerous
than sincere ignorance
and conscientious stupidity.    Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5