throw away our sample size tables? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-26 19:02 (4449 d 23:19 ago) – Posting: # 10289
Views: 25,121

Hi Martin!

iteratively adjusted alpha – super idea!


If the inflation of the consumer’s risk is real (based on our assumption to estimate pBE with a GMR at the borders of the scaled acceptance range) regulators should revise their methods. Would increase the sample size and IMHO requires a multi-step procedure.
  1. Estimate the sample size for unadjusted α
  2. Estimate adjusted α for this n
  3. Estimate the sample size for adjusted α
  4. Repeat steps 2–3 until you are in limbo

❝ […] two weirdos published a paper […]



Not their only crime. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
13 visitors (0 registered, 13 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Everything is trivial, if you know the answer.    Thomas Jaki

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5