’alpha’ of scaled ABE: design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-03-16 21:10 (4459 d 20:44 ago) – Posting: # 10208
Views: 25,305

Dear Helmut!

<nitpicking>

I would prefer a GMR of 0.80 since PowerTOST employs simulations – remember the “rounding thread”? ;-)

</nitpicking>


No rounding at all employed. Even 0.760... not.

❝ Which designs / sample sizes have you used? I’m struggling reproducing your numbers.


No explicit design written down in the code. That means default -> "2x3x3". n=48 if I remember correctly.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Everything is trivial, if you know the answer.    Thomas Jaki

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5