R/PowerTOST or Lászlós’ tables [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-02-19 16:22 (4451 d 18:02 ago) – Posting: # 10058
Views: 8,626

Hi Hiren!

❝ […] appropriate sample size for a drug […] having T/R = 0.90 and % CVintra = 60 for a Reference Replicated Pivotal BE study (3 period)? We opt for 80% power...!!!


Which regulation: FDA or EMA?Note that FDA’s method (function sampleN.RSABE) is not available in the current official release of PowerTOST (v1.1-00). I used a private copy of 1.1-01 provided by Detlew. I guess he will upload it to CRAN returning from his vacation in two weeks. In the meantime see the approximation in v1.1-00:

require(PowerTOST)
sampleN.scABEL(theta0=0.9, CV=0.6, design="2x3x3", regulator="FDA", details=FALSE)
+++++++++++ scaled (widened) ABEL +++++++++++
            Sample size estimation
---------------------------------------------
Study design:  2x3x3
log-transformed data (multiplicative model)
1e+05 studies simulated.

alpha  = 0.05, target power = 0.8
CVw(T) = 0.6; CVw(R) = 0.6
Null (true) ratio = 0.9
ABE limits / PE constraints = 0.8 ... 1.25
Regulatory body: FDA

Sample size
 n     power
30   0.800130


See also Tóthfalusi and Endrényi (2011)* – Tables A1 and A3 for GMR 0.9, CV 60%, 80% power:
EMA: 46 (round up to the next multiple of three: 48)
FDA: 31 (round up to the next multiple of three: 33)


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5