2-stage maximum likelihood of CV/RMSE, given T/R [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-10-22 17:06 (4988 d 19:27 ago) – Posting: # 9442
Views: 9,900

Dear all,

as usual I am fiddling with my compiler. And no, this is not a metaphore. At least not this time.

What I am thinking at present is this: For Potvin method B/C/D we use the CV from stage 1 in the sample size estimation for stage 2, but we do not use the observed T/R; in stead we use fixed T/R=0.9 or 0.95 etc. On the other hand we do use observed T/R when we test for BE at both stages.

So, let's be consequent and propose we will use the fixed T/R of 0.90 or 0.95 for evaluation of BE at stage 1 and dimensioning of st. 2. To do this we must then find the maximum likelihood of the anova RMSE (s, CV) given the model, the fixed T/R ratio and the observations. Can anyone suggest how to accomplish that?

Many thanks for any input.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
185 visitors (0 registered, 185 guests [including 43 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5