CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody – 2017-08-07 19:14 (3247 d 23:40 ago) – Posting: # 17673
Views: 12,495

Hi again!

Found this here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257283

Maybe I need some holiday, after all, but if I understand this correctly, the authors say, CVintra for Cmax is generally higher than for AUC, therefore use AUC to estimate the sample size of your study.

Did I get this right?

Any thoughts on this approach?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
169 visitors (0 registered, 169 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5