Data for 2nd stage of Potvin’s designs [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by BE-proff – 2017-02-18 07:40 (2982 d 01:47 ago) – Posting: # 17078
Views: 16,167

Hi All,

I have some questions on Potvin's designs:;-)

1) is it correct that GMR and CV are required for sample size calculation for 2nd stage in all Potvin's designs?

2) Why Method C is considered "better" for sponsors than Method B?

The 1st question arised because Potvin's article dated 2007 says that only CV is needed for A and B while Method C uses both GMR and CV.

But on the other hand there are also opinions that all methods require GMR and CV.

Unclear....:confused:

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,703 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say.    William W. Watt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5