post hoc power [Power / Sample Size]

posted by VSL – India, 2015-07-01 21:37 (4001 d 21:14 ago) – Posting: # 15008
Views: 12,092

Dear,
It has been seen that In protocol, larger sample size is selected to just pass the study without any scientific justification or selecting high T/R in sample size calculation. Therefore, in many cases, post hoc power is more than 100% or nearly 100%. It is like forced bio-equivalence.
Does regulator seek justification for this?
Thanks and Regards...
VSL

Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5