3-per, 2-trt designs and estimation of intra-subj. variance [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-08-12 21:54 (4702 d 12:41 ago) – Posting: # 11264
Views: 14,433

Hi all,


I think it sounds fully plausible and intuitive to say that intrasubject variabilities for Test products cannot be estimated in TRR/RTR/RRT xover designs. We do not have replication of Test and this is the principal argument.

But is that really a reflection of the facts?

Well, due to the replication of Ref we can estimate s2wR as well as s2b, with w being 'within' and b being 'between'. I think it can be argued that in a crossover it makes no sense to discuss different betweens-variances between treatments.
Now, the variance of the observations done on test will be s2wT + s2b - this is what we will have on the diagonal of the covariance matrix V.
So, we can definitely estimate the sum (s2wT + s2b), and since the ref. replication allows us to get s2b, I see no reason why we cannot estimate the elusive s2wT.

Try to think about it without just blindly referencing what a guideline says.
Now butcher me, please. :pirate:


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
344 visitors (0 registered, 344 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5