0.760 or... [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-01-17 15:38 (5214 d 18:33 ago) – Posting: # 6429
Views: 30,570

Dear D. Labes!

❝ […] therefore the sample size is independent of the variability. […] For this reason the FDA has discussed 24 or32 subjects for scaled ABE. […] But don't know where these numbers exactly came from.


32 was FDA’s suggestion back in 2006 (see here). 24 is FDA’s current requirement (personal communication with Barbara Davit, Ljubljana, May 2010).

if (CV>=0.3) theta1 <- exp(-0.760*CV2se(CVr)) else theta1 <- 0.8

# change 0.76 to log(1.25)/CV2se(0.3) if you prefer higher precision

# for the regulatory constant


❝ Lets see what the results are:

# Targetpower=0.8, theta0=0.95, alpha=0.05, design=2x3x3 partial replicate

❝ Regulatory body: EMA k=0.760

»

     CV   theta1  theta2 Sample size Achieved power

---------------------------------------------------

  0.300 0.800030 1.24995          30       0.820245  # limits not exact 0.8 - 1.25


Yes, we discussed that already in #5249pp. As the grumpy old man I am I was already lamenting in one of my lectures (slides 32-33). Though I have only used exact widened limits of 0.75 and 0.75-1 in the past (not UL of 1.3333) I woudn’t bet on the acceptability of the exact value (which I will use anyway). As you mentioned in your commented code, one will get the ‘correct’ limits by calculating the regulatory constant based on a CV of 30%.
theta1 <- exp(-log(1.25)/CV2se(0.3)*CV2se(CVr))
    CV   theta1  theta2 Sample size Achieved power
---------------------------------------------------
 0.300 0.800000 1.25000          30       0.820400  # limits exactly 0.8 - 1.25
 0.325 0.785946 1.27235          30       0.833446
 0.350 0.772289 1.29485          27       0.802301
 0.400 0.746140 1.34023          27       0.818245
 0.450 0.721506 1.38599          27       0.829288
 0.500 0.698326 1.43200          27       0.837245
---------------------------------------------------
 0.550 0.698326 1.43200          30       0.811569
 0.600 0.698326 1.43200          36       0.826651
 0.650 0.698326 1.43200          39       0.802849
 0.700 0.698326 1.43200          45       0.812654


P.S.: Do you think that engineers would use 3.14 instead of π, because it’s written in a guideline? Bridges would collpase, trains derail, etc. :-D

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
65 visitors (0 registered, 65 guests [including 0 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5