Proc Plan 4x4 crossover [General Statistics]
Dear John,
Looking at the result of your code (hope you have checked it by yourself) I noticed that there is not too much random in your randomization
.
Just a 6 times repetition of the sequences
May be that some regulators/assessors are not satisfied with that. See Helmut's post on a similar question for a randomization of 2x2 crossover designs.
Try to use
❝ Do you see anything strange on my 4-way crossover randomization code?
Looking at the result of your code (hope you have checked it by yourself) I noticed that there is not too much random in your randomization
.Just a 6 times repetition of the sequences
1 ADBC
2 DBCA
3 BCAD
4 CADBMay be that some regulators/assessors are not satisfied with that. See Helmut's post on a similar question for a randomization of 2x2 crossover designs.
Try to use
random instead of ordered after your factor Subject—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- To learn something new in 2×2 Randomization purvaph 2012-07-04 05:45
- Ugly Proc Plan d_labes 2012-07-04 17:06
- Ugly Proc Plan purvaph 2012-07-24 07:11
- Ugly Proc Plan jag009 2012-09-18 17:50
- Proc Plan 4x4 crossoverd_labes 2012-09-19 16:46
- Proc Plan 4x4 crossover jag009 2012-09-20 21:20
- Proc Plan 4x4 crossover jag009 2012-09-25 18:07
- 4x4 crossover - Latin square or Williams d_labes 2012-09-26 11:59
- Proc Plan 4x4 crossoverd_labes 2012-09-19 16:46
- Ugly Proc Plan d_labes 2012-07-04 17:06
