FARTSSIE 3.0 [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-06-19 16:55 (714 d 11:22 ago) – Posting: # 24032
Views: 6,997

Dear all,

two days ago Dave published v3.0 on GitHub. Changed: Correct calculation of CVtotal from the 90 or 95% CI of a study in a parallel design (sheet [Bioequivalence, Parallel], CV from published Point Estimate and CI); it was wrong in v2.8 and v2.9.
Like in the 🇷-package PowerTOST – function CVfromCI(), the CI and group sizes are mandatory and the PE is optional.
With the Cmax-results of this post (90% CI: 0.7475–1.3656, n1 10, n2 9) in Excel 365 on Windows 11:

[image]

CVfromCI() and Phoenix WinNonlin give 39.08% as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
250 visitors (0 registered, 250 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5