Wow! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-02-08 13:19 (4462 d 23:49 ago) – Posting: # 9993
Views: 10,666

Dear Detlew!

❝ No need to set up your own simulations. Just let PowerTOST do the job :cool::

❝ And the best of all: computational time for each step approx. 1-2 sec for 1E+06 sims, believe it or not :yes:.


Do you want to marry me? The community will love you for that! Opens even the door for two-stage simulations where the intermediate power/sample size was the actual show-stopper.

❝ In case of regulator="FDA" the sample size is only approximate since the BE decision method via widened BE limits is not exactly what is expected by the FDA. But the two Laszlos state that the scABEL method should be 'operational' equivalent to the FDA method. Thus the sample size should be comparable.


Agree. Remember this one? Somewhere in electronic nirvana I have presentations by Donald Schuirmann showing scaled limits ‘for demonstrational purposes’ as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5