Sample Size Replicated Study [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-08-21 11:13 (6513 d 00:20 ago) – Posting: # 2211
Views: 11,055

Dear HS,

❝ Yes; see this post for TRT/RTR (75% of TR/RT) and TRRT/RTTR (50% of TR/RT).

❝ No idea about TRR/RTT...


as I have understood until now all 3 period and all 4 period replicate designs, regardless of which sequences are used, have the same variance of the treatment effect namely
   3 period : 3/8*s2/N
   4 period : 1/8*s2/N

if no carry-over term is incorporated in the model.

Compared to the common 2x2 design with variance
   1/2*s2/N
you get your mentioned 75% or 50% respectively.

See for that
Jones and Kenward
Design and Analsis of Cross-over Trials
Chapter 3

Only if a carry-over term (as simple carry over in different flavors) or other interaction terms are introduced in the model different variances arose for the different designs.

Regarding the carry-over (and the model for simple carry-over) I adopt SENN's position: With an adequate wash-out period an standardization of the study it is futile in BE studies.
Interesting enough there is no teensy-weensy attempt of incorporation of carry-over in the FDA code for analysing average BE in replicate designs.

Thus IMHO we have always the same sample size estimation formula for 3 or 4 period replicate designs.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
127 visitors (0 registered, 127 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5