Unknown x corrected? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-10-01 14:14 (5742 d 11:27 ago) – Posting: # 5970
Views: 40,925

Dear J. Detlor,

❝ I saw this and thought I'd post my opinion.


❝ I believe the calculated x value represents the 'true' value of squared difference ((YT-YR)2)). If we simply square the log difference, we actually have (YT-YR)2)) + sigma_d2 (As shown here)


Thanks for your opinion.

But I'm not quite sure if this applies in our context.
What makes me curious about this is that in the various papers about scaled ABE and also about Individual BE (where (µTR)2 is also part of the IBE criterion) there is not any hint of such a 'correction'.
:ponder:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5