Mixed MoM [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-05-04 16:40 (5886 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 5285
Views: 41,513

Dear EM,

❝ Nice post d_labes,


Thanx for the flowers.

❝ Last, to address my own bonus question partially, I think there could be a practical difference between the FDA approach and the way by a Mixed Model. They may achieve exactly the same in the cases where there are no missing values.


That was also my opinion before. But what I liked to illustrate with my post is that this is not always true. We have here no missing values, balance also. But very different results of the first part of the scaled average BE criterion.

BTW: I'm not sure if MoM is a misnomer. But in the FDA guidance the analogous evaluation if the IBE and PBE criterion via sample statistics is named such.

BTW2: I'm not sure where the bear dataset comes from and if the described phenomenon is real or relies on an artificial dataset.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
148 visitors (0 registered, 148 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5